At TCS, we don’t just help businesses transform. We help them become perpetually adaptive enterprises, built to evolve continuously and confidently in a world of constant change.
We deliver excellence and create value for customers and communities - everyday. With the best talent and the latest technology we help customers turn complexity into opportunities and create meaningful change.
Point of views, research, studies - on the latest themes - to help you expand your knowledge and be future ready.
At TCS, we believe exceptional work begins with hiring, celebrating and nurturing the best people — from all walks of life.
Sam Genesis
Chief Innovation Evangelist, Healthcare unit, TCS
Sajeeli Goyle
Domain Consultant, Healthcare, TCS
You have these already downloaded
We have sent you a copy of the report to your email again.
In an industry where precision matters but complexity overwhelms healthcare payers have long wrestled with turning data into decisions. For all the data and performance dashboards available, most consequential decisions still live in the chasm between fragmented workflows and judgment calls. Made too late and with too little optionality. In the hands of overburdened humans, good intent doesn’t always translate to good judgment. These decisions shape cost, care quality, and customer trust.
Intelligent Choice Architectures (ICAs) offer a new path by augmenting deep domain expertise and human empathy with AI that simplifies complexity, surfaces options, and learns from every choice. They reimagine the environment where choices happen.
While automation has chipped away at routine tasks, they mostly focus on streamlining decision process and optimizing efficiency. However, automation assumes that the decision logic is already sound and will continue to remain so. It doesn’t adapt as market environments change. While it may speed up the throughput, it does so by obfuscating the underlying framework from decision makers.
Consequently, payers now face too many rules, too much data, and too little clarity. Human decision-makers such as claims processors, care managers, and analysts are buried under cryptic codes, toggling across systems, and improvising around undocumented exceptions. As a result, the industry is trapped with static frameworks in a dynamic environment, hidden in plain sight.
ICAs offer a reset. By combining predictive models, generative AI, and context engineering, ICAs elevate the choice set, personalize guidance, and explain trade-offs before any decision is made. They shift the frame from “how do I resolve this?” to “what are the best options here, and why?”
Today, over 90% of claims are processed automatically by rule engines. But it’s the edge cases that absorb disproportionate time, cost, and risk. These claims often require deep policy interpretation, eligibility checks, prior utilization reviews, and exception handling across multiple legacy systems and institutional memory that often lives in the heads of seasoned adjudicators.
AI agents can relieve this cognitive burden. By integrating predictive models with generative reasoning capabilities and customer context allows agents to understand benefits history, policy terms, prior utilization, exceptions, and regulatory logic. Deployed within an ICA framework, these agents can surface resolution paths with step-by-step guidance, flags potential conflicts, and back up their reasoning with citations from internal rules and regulatory frameworks.
Early projections suggest a 15–20% reduction in handling time for complex cases and a measurable drop in training cycles.
The job of healthcare executives is changing. The command-and-control model of decision approval will not scale. ICAs force a rethink of decision rights. Who decides what options are presented? Who interprets trade-offs? Leadership’s job won’t be to make every decision. It’s to engineer the conditions for the right ones to emerge.
Leaders must focus on defining how decisions get made, what choices are presented, what trade-offs are visible, and what values are encoded into the system.
Better decisions compound. When payers move beyond “correctness” and optimize for judgment, outcomes improve across dimensions: faster resolution, reduced overpayments, better provider relationships, and more satisfied members.
That’s because ICAs enable three key shifts:
Consider how ICAs might reshape the decision environment for assessing population health and care management. By integrating claims and clinical data, the ICA proposes who might be at risk and why. Early indicators such as shifts in utilization, gaps in medication adherence, signs of vulnerability are framed within context.
The objective is to create a context in which the right questions surface early and the right actions follow naturally. Teams are guided toward possible interventions with a clear view of rationale, trade-offs, and likely impact.
Teams are no longer navigating fragmented tools and reports. Instead, they engage in an environment that foregrounds what matters, enabling focus, not fatigue.
The system doesn’t dictate the next steps. It invites deliberation. Multiple paths are presented where each is tied to policy logic and past outcomes giving professionals room to weigh options without reinventing the wheel.
As decisions are made, the architecture learns. Risk prediction sharpens. Recommendations evolve. Over time, the system helps the organization move upstream catching patterns earlier, acting sooner, and supporting preventive strategies with confidence.
In healthcare, the stakes are personal. Every decision has ethical, financial, and human consequences. AI doesn’t replace trust. It must earn it.
ICAs are built on trust. And trust demands transparency. Explainable, auditable AI is built into every layer, from model behavior to recommendation logic. When an adjudicator asks, “why this option?”, the system should respond with reasoning, citations, and a log of its process.
ICAs tame complexity. They translate data into confidence, speed into clarity, and rules into results. They recenter attention on human judgment. The future of healthcare isn’t digital. It’s decisional. And the payers who invest in decision environments will define it.