What we do
TCS Research
TCS Research and Innovation: Inventing for Impact
Highlights
- Monitoring systems record events, but meaningful elder care depends on understanding what those events represent in the context of an individual's daily life.
- Small changes in routine often reveal more about well-being than isolated alerts, making patterns as important as individual sensor events.
- More data does not automatically create better care. Care intelligence emerges when data is transformed into context, patterns, and meaningful insights.
- Personal baselines help distinguish normal behaviour from meaningful change, allowing care decisions to be guided by the individual rather than generic thresholds.
- The future of elder care lies in technologies that support caregivers with context-rich insights while preserving privacy, dignity, and human judgement.
In this article
In this articleinpage
Why is monitoring alone not enough in elder care?
Nothing appears unusual. No alarm has been triggered. No emergency has happened.
Yet this simple sequence of ordinary events raises an important question: are we simply recording activity, or are we truly understanding what it means?
The importance of monitoring and recording events goes without saying when it comes to elderly care.
Let us consider a day of an older adult. They wake up at 6:45 AM with a movement detected in the bedroom. Next, around 7:05 AM, their activity is observed in the bathroom and at 7:30 AM, movement is observed in the kitchen area. Later in the morning, the resident keeps moving between the living room and other areas such as kitchen, bedroom, and bathroom.
For a sensor system, these are individual events: movement detected, room occupied, activity recorded. A monitoring system may capture hundreds of such events every day. Yet without context, it cannot determine whether the resident's routine is normal, changing, or potentially in need of attention. However, a caregiver’s support mechanism recognises a familiar routine and gains reassurance that the resident's day has begun as expected. The difference between these two perspectives represents one of the most important opportunities existing in the evolution of elder care technology.
While monitoring gives us information about what happened, the real meaning may be entirely different from what it appears to be. As the world continues to evolve, the goal of elder care can no longer be about detecting isolated events but rather about gathering insights into an individual's well-being.
Monitoring tells us what happened. Meaning helps us understand what it may represent. As elder care evolves, the goal is no longer simply to detect isolated events, but to understand what those events reveal about an individual's well-being.
How do most elder care monitoring systems work today?
Most of the elder care monitoring systems still operate using a simple event-driven model despite the advances happening around sensing and connectivity.
Sense an event → Record the event → Apply a rule → Generate an alert.
This architecture is essential in situations that require immediate attention. However, monitoring the well-being of the adults involves a lot more than just about responding to emergencies. Their daily activities and routines can provide valuable insights about their overall well-being. Since these activities unfold throughout the day any changes might not even appear as a trigger for immediate alert.
From the same example mentioned on elder care monitoring, it can be agreed upon that almost all the activities paint a normal picture of an older adult. It's because every activity together forms a pattern, building a rhythm over time for that individual, displaying normal behaviour. Now, let's imagine the situation a little differently, where the routine begins to change.
Let’s say the wake-up time is pushed back, kitchen visits become less frequent, bodily movements during the day have decreased, and the frequency of bathroom visits at night has increased. At this point, with fewer occurrences of the changes, in general, no alarms will be generated, nor any panic buttons will be pressed for notifications to the user. Only if the changes are observed for too long that draws an unusual pattern, the system generates a different question: 'Is something changing with this resident's daily pattern of life?' This appears to be one of the key limitations with the event-driven model: the system fails to notify the caregivers about the observed changes with a limited data. As a result, potential health or well-being concerns may go unnoticed delaying timely intervention and offering preventive care to the older adults.
Hence, it signifies the critical need for the elder care monitoring system to evolve with the dynamics of the problem, thereby offering a proactive and preventive approach for users.
Why doesn't more data always mean better care?
Consider a technology-equipped home or an assisted living facility through the lens of a monitoring system. Every day, movement sensors, contact sensors on doors, body-worn devices, and other equipment generate a large volume of data. While additional sensor installations can provide users with more information, they don’t guarantee improved care.
For instance, the readings available to a caregiver entails the following: motion detected in the bedroom, movement detected in the bathroom, and activity detected in the kitchen. Although each of the elder care monitoring reports are technically sound, interpreting and understanding their significance still requires human effort. The same information could instead be presented in a more insightful manner: The resident is maintaining the usual morning routine with no notable changes observed.
This illustrates an important distinction: Collecting data from the sensor is the beginning. The real value lies in interpreting that data in the context to reveal patterns about an older adult life.
From separate events to context, from raw data to patterns, and from observation to meaning.
Placing events within context makes the information more useful. Identifying patterns make the data worthwhile. Therefore, an observational data becomes care intelligence when it enables caregivers to see which changes are important.
The dimensions of elder care well-being
Why are personal baselines important in elder care?
For monitoring systems to identify meaningful changes, they must establish a baseline of the individual ‘s daily behaviour. One of the limitations with the traditional monitoring systems is their reliance on predefined thresholds, such as no movement for two hours, three-bathroom visits during the night, waking up after 9:00 AM, or daily activity falling below a specified level. While such thresholds are useful, but human routines are deeply subjective. What is normal for one resident may be unusual for another. A universal definition of "normal activity" is very difficult to establish in elder care. The best meaningful comparison may be between the resident's current behaviour and their own established routine.
Let us consider two residents who both now wake up at 9:00 AM. For Resident A, this has been their normal routine for several months. For Resident B, who typically wakes up at 6:30 AM, this represents a significant change. The event is pretty much identical, but the meaning is very different. This is why the next generation of elder care technology must become increasingly capable of understanding personal baselines.
The question should not always be ‘Is this behaviour unusual?’. Rather, it will be more useful to ask, ‘Is this behaviour unusual for this individual?’
What is routine intelligence in elder care?
Building on personal baselines, the need for routine intelligence is of high priority today specially in many assisted living facilities. While sensors are becoming increasingly capable, building better intelligence for the elderly care will not necessarily come from sensors. Accordingly, the routine intelligence helps in understanding the individual’s everyday living pattern by identifying meaningful deviations that occur over time. However, the real opportunity for an effective intelligence system lies in understanding relationships among activity, time and context for which it needs to capture beyond the isolated events. Therefore, apart from the typical data collection, such as when, where, and the frequency of the activity, the system for elder care should be able to compare before-and-after data and how the pattern varies across days and weeks. The true value of an intelligence is about understanding the context around the trigger of the sensor.
Not every deviation needs to be a wake-up call for users or the caregivers. However, waking up a little later on a single day is very different from the same observation over two weeks, which needs attention. In that way, routine intelligence can be of great help in reducing the unnecessary notifications and increasing focus on the changes that matter.
How can elder care technology support caregivers better?
Caregiving teams in assisted living environments already operate in information-rich environments. They manage resident needs, respond to emergencies, coordinate with families, maintain care records, and observe behavioural and physical changes. Now, adding more raw sensor data to this environment can create an additional cognitive burden.
The role of intelligent elder care technology should therefore not be limited to collecting information; it should be able to help organise and contextualise information. Instead of presenting hundreds of sensor events, a care system could communicate:
- Routine stable. No meaningful deviation observed.
- Nighttime activity has increased over the last seven days compared with the resident's normal pattern.
- Daytime movement has gradually reduced while time spent in the bedroom has increased. A routine well-being check may be considered.
Note: Technology provides content but only a human can care. The system is not a replacement for either a medical diagnosis or a caregiver's judgement. It only supports the caregiver in making them realise the area of focus that requires human attention.
How can elder care technology protect privacy?
Must we sacrifice privacy to obtain stronger intelligence and offer improved care for older adults? Certainly not. Behavioural awareness must remain separate from unbroken monitoring. People ageing at home deserve their space for independence, dignity, and personal privacy. Accordingly, the monitoring systems should move beyond ‘How much data could the technology acquire? ‘And consider instead, what is the smallest amount of information that can yield relevant care findings?
In addition, activity trends can also be captured without the utilisation of camera or microphones. This is rather called as the non-visual ambient detectors which helps in detecting the movement or capture other important indications without the records of speech or imagery.
In elder care, an effective intelligence system will not allow any intrusion beyond what's necessary. Privacy ought to guide the exact material detected. The same applies to all decisions, deductions and disclosures on who gets to see the resulting information.
Meaningful elder care intelligence should not require unnecessary intrusion. Privacy should influence what exactly is sensed, stored, inferred, and shared, and importantly who can access the resulting insights.
What is the future of elder care technology?
A home's sensor count will not define the future of elder care technology. The same is true of the quantity of information accumulated and the tally of notifications produced. Its usefulness will be judged increasingly by its response to a distinctly human concern: Has something shifted in this resident's life that calls for the caregiver’s attention?
The field's next development is a change in focus. Individual occurrences become recognisable patterns; notifications gain explanatory context. Observed activity is examined for meaning. Better care does not invariably arise from having more knowledge available. On occasion, it starts when what is already known is understood more clearly.